The latest quarterly Construction Management Intelligence report from Rider Levett Bucknall reveals a sector that has shifted from optimism to caution, with many now assessing how the Middle East conflict will be contained and what the short, mid or long-term impact may be on the industry.
Recent data from the Office for National Statistics revealed that new orders for construction had risen by 12.6% year on year, with the market outlook boosted by an increase of more than 46% in infrastructure and nearly 41% in new orders for public housing projects. But that was then.
Before the Middle East conflict escalated, inflation felt like it was under control and interest rates were on a downward trajectory. However, geopolitical developments have introduced new uncertainty into the economic outlook, with recent speculation about fuel increases and supply chain and procurement challenges due to trade channels closing, and the resulting impact on inflation and interest rates.
RLB has raised its tender price inflation forecast for 2026 to 3.45%, compared to the previous quarter forecast of 3.27%. However, there will be heightened volatility with RLB describing concurrent input cost increases and dampened pipelines. Contractors are likely to continue to price selectively, with risk allowances varying by sector and project type rather than moving uniformly across the market, the firm says.
Paul Beeston, head of industry and service insight at RLB, said: “Once again, the industry is navigating the impact of international events. We are increasingly seeing tender prices influenced more by geopolitical factors than by traditional economic cycles. Much will depend on how quickly the current situation is resolved, but it is important to recognise that many underlying conditions are more positive today than during previous shocks. While risks have risen, it is important not to allow rhetoric to overtake reality.
“If disruption is short lived, any inflationary pressure from higher input costs is likely to be moderated by slowing pipelines. However, a more prolonged period of disruption would shift the balance of risk between concurrent input cost pressures and pipeline concerns which will pull tender prices in different directions in different sectors. In that environment, informed decision making, rather than over reaction, will be critical.”
Another construction economist, Allan Wilen from industry data gatherer Glenigan, has also issued an alert on the increased market volatility.
“Whilst the international situation remains incredibly uncertain, the UK business & industry landscape is already starting to feel the pinch of the extreme volatility we’ve experienced over the past fortnight, especially construction,” he said.
“From house-building to major infrastructure, the shockwaves will be felt as the prospect of lower borrowing costs fade and as operational costs spiral from higher energy costs and reduced access to key structural materials as the strait of Hormuz remains at the centre of the conflict zone.
“UK construction activity remains significantly depressed. Our latest Index, tracking projects under £100 million starting on site, shows a 15% year-on-year decline in value, and is 24% lower than 2024 figures. At the same time, a limited pipeline of projects over £100 million has contributed to a 26% year-on-year contraction in the overall market.
“For the industry this means that those currently weak areas, especially private residential, will continue to slide and other areas which have seen increases, such as commercial offices, will see that growth put in jeopardy. This makes existing pipelines extremely fragile with no guarantee that signed and sealed projects will be delivered according to agreed dates.
“The supply chain across the industry will be watching the situation nervously, with the best outcome being a swift resolution of the conflict and the unblocking of trade routes. Every day of logistical disruption is a body blow for construction and will set back recovery even further into the future.
“In the meantime, firms need to assess the vulnerability of their order books to delay and higher construction costs, and seek to ensure that they identify and secure new projects that can bridge potential gaps in their workload.”