Adebanjo Adebayo Talabi, the director of Bebo ԭ Limited, has received a suspended prison sentence, a community service order and a six-year director ban after pleading guilty to three counts of fraud by false representation.
During the pandemic, Talabi submitted three claims for Covid Bounce Back Loans totalling £150,000 by exaggerating his company’s turnover
Based on its actual turnover, the company would have been entitled to one loan of approximately £1,300.
Adebanjo Adebayo Talabi, from Alvey Street, Walworth, was the director of Bebo ԭ Limited. An Insolvency Service investigation found the 42-year-old applied for three loans, between August and November 2020, from three separate banks.
Talabi pleaded guilty to three counts of fraud by false representation and was sentenced at Southwark Crown Court on 24th February 2026. He received a two-year prison sentence, suspended for two years on condition of completing 200 hours of unpaid work, and was disqualified from being a company director for six years.
During sentencing, it was noted that Talabi has begun to repay the money owed and, as such, the Insolvency Service will not be pursuing action under the Proceeds of Crime Act.
Insolvency Service chief investigator David Snasdell said: “This is significant sentence which imposes a number of long-term restrictions on Adebanjo Adebayo Talabi, while taking into account his guilty plea and efforts to pay back the money his company owes.
“The Insolvency Service will continue to pursue those who exploited the Covid Bounce Back Loan scheme, aimed at supporting struggling businesses through the pandemic.”
Talabi successfully applied for three Bounce Back Loans for Bebo ԭ Limited – each worth £50,000 – on 1st August, 20th August and 5th November 2020. On each occasion he affirmed that the company’s turnover was between £200,000 and £220,000 – which was found to be significantly inflated. For the second and third loan, Talabi falsely stated that they were the first and only loan applications for the company.
Additionally, evidence from the Insolvency Service investigation found that the loans had been transferred to personal accounts and not used for the economic benefit of the company, which was a requirement of the scheme.